Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Please be seated. Let the record reflect I think that we've been rejoined by all the members of our jury panel. Let me make sure. Yep. They're all here. All right. Andrea Mazzola is again on the witness stand undergoing cross-examination by Mr. Neufeld. Miss Mazzola, good afternoon again.
Miss Mazzola, again calling your attention to collecting a stain demonstration board with the still photographs on it, would you agree, Miss Mazzola, that the still photographs depicted--shown on this board, because they are still photographs, don't capture the continuous motion involved in the entire process of bloodstain collection?
And when you first set out to do this demonstration for Mr. Goldberg and the Prosecution, did the Prosecution attempt to record this demonstration with a videotape as well?
And it was your job during this videotape demonstration to act out the role of the criminalist collecting bloodstains?
When this videotape was being made of you doing the demonstration, Miss Mazzola, was it your understanding that it was being produced for the purpose of showing it to the jury during the trial?
That was a possibility. I don't think they came right out and said it would be shown. It was a possibility.
What was your understanding--when you were engaged in this demonstration for the District Attorney and the videocamera is rolling, what is your understanding of what the purpose of this videotape was going to be?
And so while the District Attorney was producing this videotape, you tried to perform the task of criminalist to the best of your ability; is that correct?
And knowing that the videotape was meant to represent the process of bloodstain collection as practiced by you, you also tried to make it as realistic as possible; did you not?
Now, while you were performing the demonstration--I'm sorry. Withdrawn. Did Mr. Goldberg ever tell you at any time either during the videotape or after the videotape that he was concerned that the videotape revealed some common accidents?
Did Mr. Goldberg or any Prosecutor ever tell you that it was important to convey to this jury how simple crime scene--I'm sorry--bloodstain collection is?
Did any Prosecutor ever express to you the importance of conveying to this jury that it's actually--that it is a simple procedure?
Okay. I'm not asking what was the main issue. Was it a secondary issue that was conveyed to you by the Prosecutors, that they wanted to show or suggest to the jury--
Counsel, secondary, tertiary, I mean where are we going to go with this? Was it discussed by any Prosecutor with you to show that how simple a process it was?
Miss Mazzola, during your prep sessions with Mr. Goldberg, did he tell you that there was a chance that this videotape might be played for the jury?
Are you aware of the fact that on the videotape you are depicted dropping swatches?
And during your prep sessions with the Prosecutors in this case, didn't they tell you that on direct examination, you should admit that you dropped swatches occasionally in the event that this videotape is played to the jury? Didn't that come out?
In the prep sessions with Mr. Goldberg and the other Prosecutors, didn't they tell you that there was a chance that this videotape might get played for this jury by the Defense?
Okay. And you also knew that on this videotape, you are depicted dropping swatches; isn't that correct?
And during the prep session with Mr. Goldberg and other Prosecutors, was it discussed that you should readily acknowledge occasionally dropping swatches at crime scenes?
Well, do you recall on direct examination Mr. Goldberg asking you about whether you dropped swatches?
Well, during those prep sessions, you said some of them lasted as much as five hours?
I understand that. You said some of the sessions lasted overall as many as five hours at the Prosecutor's office; is that right?
I was at the Prosecutor's office for upwards of five hours, but not talking to them the entire time.
And on some of those days, they would ask you questions that they intended to ask you once you took the witness stand; did they not?
All right. Well, was one of the questions that you discussed during those prep sessions a question involving you dropping swatches during a crime scene collection?
Are you saying that the very first time you ever heard that question asked was when you took the witness stand here? A I believe it was mentioned when we were taking the photographs for the collection demonstration.
Your Honor, I've never done this before in front of the jury. So there may be a couple of times where I ask to go back and slow it down and please indulge me a little bit.
It says 4-4-95. Does that refresh your recollection as to when this videotape was made?
Okay. Okay. Go ahead. I'm sorry. Do me a favor. I'm sorry, your Honor. Could you just go back to the beginning one more time? Can you stop there a minute?
You want to describe--unfortunately, Mr. Neufeld, since we don't have a real-time counter and if you're going to isolate particular items, you're going to need to describe them, either print them or describe them.
And, Miss Mazzola, just before this shot where you put the right hand down on the dirty ground, did you clean the tweezers?
--did you just take the tweezers and put them--and move them from the left hand and transfer them to the right hand?
And that's the right hand that you just had put down on the dirty ground; is that correct?
Freeze there for a second. Could you just go back about 10 frames or five seconds? Right there.
Now, at that particular moment, Miss Mazzola, was a swatch about to fall out of the cap and you prevented it from falling out by catching it or bringing your right pinkie into contact with that cap?
Well, can you back up a second? All right. Little bit more. Okay. Would you show that little sequence in show motion, please? And just keeping going down then.
Didn't you just bring your hand down to that cap because a swatch was about to fall out off the cap; and it didn't, you saved it?
I don't believe so because it appears that I'm putting the cap back on the bottle; and if a swatch was in there, I wouldn't turn the cap over because the swatch would fall out anyway.
Can you just back it up five seconds? Let us see this one more time, regular speed. Back, back, back, back a little more. Okay. Now start it.
Didn't you just see you do something with your pinkie, Miss Mazzola, to try to catch something on that cap?
All right. And the same hand that you're using to catch that swatch at that point, if that's what you could have been doing, is the same right hand that you had just put down on the dirty ground; is that correct?
And, Miss Mazzola, on the dirty pavement outdoors like this, would you expect to see some kind of dirt or debris on the control swatch?
Now, when you put the plastic bag in the envelope at that point, you folded it over to seal it, didn't you?
Other than preventing the swatches from slipping out, by folding over the top of the plastic bag when it's wet inside, that also will--that will also result in preserving the moisture in those swatches, wouldn't it?
Could you just back up about--back up. Go a little more. Okay. Now go forward a little bit.
Now, after you make the control swatch, Miss Mazzola, you then clean the tweezers off before you go on to actually collect the bloodstain; is that correct?
And what you just did, ma'am, was to pick up--you're going to use that wet wipe or Kleenex to clean the tweezer, right?
All right. And you just picked up that chem-wipe with the same right hand which you had been resting on the dirty concrete, right?
Now, Miss Mazzola, you just transferred the tweezers that you just cleaned back into the right hand again, didn't you?
You moved your fingers further up toward the front of the tweezers, didn't you? Miss Mazzola, isn't the tweezer now completely enclosed in your hand, in your right hand?
I don't know if it's entirely enclosed or if my finger is just brought up along the side of it.
Well, Miss Mazzola, your fingers that are brought up along the side of it are the fingers of your right hand that you had just put down on the dirty pavement; isn't that correct?
Now, Miss Mazzola, do you see some of the swatches that fell to the ground between the bottle and your knee?
At this time--I noticed last time when you took the cap off the bottle, after you took out a swatch, you put it right back on the bottle, didn't you, last time?
Is that because you considered for even a moment perhaps putting those swatches that fell to the ground back into the bottle?
Miss Mazzola, when you made this demonstration tape, were you aware of the fact that your right hand had been resting on the dirty concrete?
And, Miss Mazzola, you said you did know, however, that you had dropped swatches during the course of this videotape, right?
And in fact, comment had been made by others present about the fact that you had dropped swatches; isn't that correct?
Well--you also testified on direct examination, Miss Mazzola, that you had never dropped the swatch that had blood on it. Was that your testimony?
Well, had the Prosecutor told you during the prep sessions that it was safe for you to give that answer because we don't have you doing that on the videotape?
You also testified, Miss Mazzola, on direct examination that one reason--I'm sorry. Withdrawn. You also testified that at crime scenes, your gloved hand has never touched a bloodstain or wet blood; is that correct?
But isn't one reason why you wear these protective gloves in the first place is because you could accidentally touch a bloodstain or wet blood?
Well, when you say you wear these gloves for your own protection, Miss Mazzola, isn't that protect--isn't that to protect you from an accidental contact with blood? Isn't that the whole purpose you wear the gloves?
Okay. So it's anticipated by the people who taught you at SID to wear gloves that accidental contact between a criminalist and blood does happen from time to time; isn't that correct?
So when you say that you have never touched blood or a wet bloodstain even with your protected gloves on, what you're really saying is that you've never done it such as that you're aware of it; isn't that correct?
Now, as you see, Miss Mazzola, do you see the--the jury can see it too. Do you see the moist area where you had made the control swatch?
And do you see that the moisture has run all the way over to the point where it's actually in contact with the bloodstain?
I don't know if that is moisture from the control swatch or the pigment of the concrete itself.
May we please go back quickly to--reverse, show her just the collection of the control swatch? Back up more. Back, back, back. Back up. Back up before it starts touching it. Back up so it's just off the ground, you know, an inch or so. Okay. Go ahead. Stop. Can you back up? I want to get it just before it makes contact. Stop. Stop.
Now that you see the control swatch just as it's about to hit the control area next to stain no. 5, would you agree that the discoloration we saw later on when you're actually about to lift the bloodstain is moisture from the control swatch?
Miss Mazzola, do you actually see any discoloration in the area immediately adjacent to that bloodstain in this picture before you put that wet control swatch on the ground?
I see the area slightly in front of the swatch between the swatch and the stain itself.
Isn't the area at that point, Miss Mazzola, fairly consistent and not darker, appreciably darker in the area--in the immediate area where you're placing down the control swatch at this point? Isn't that a fair assessment of what's depicted here, ma'am?
Now, could you go forward to where she's about to put down the--yeah. Go a little bit further. Slow it down. In slow-mo. That's right.
Now do you see the discoloration created by the moisture emanating out from the control swatch?
And that's a different color than the other discolorations in the pavement, isn't it?
Okay. All right. And you can see even at that point the moisture has almost touched the bloodstain, hasn't it?
By the way, Miss Mazzola, the swatch that you just picked up could be the same swatch that you had touched with the right hand to help stay in the cap, couldn't it?
Now, Miss Mazzola, can you see that the moisture has spread out from the control swatch so it is in fact touching the blood drop stain?
When you received your instruction on how to collect bloodstain evidence, although you were taught to collect a control close to the bloodstain, you were also taught, Miss Mazzola, not to allow the moisture from the control swatch to come into contact with the bloodstain; isn't that correct?
well, Miss Mazzola, if in fact that swatch itself had been contaminated by your dirty hand, for instance, would the contamination be transferred to the moisture that is emanating out from the swatch? Could that happen?
Well, if there was dirt on your hand and your hand came into contact with the control swatch, would you agree that it's possible that there could be a transfer of that trace evidence of that contaminant from your glove to the swatch?
And would you agree, ma'am, that if that control swatch was moistened with water, that there could be a transfer of trace evidence from the swatch to the water?
There would be items from the ground in the water, but the bloodstain itself is on the ground. So it's all in the same substrate.
Well, that assumes, does it not, Miss Mazzola, that everywhere on the ground, you have the same contaminants and the same substrate? Isn't that correct?
Well, Miss Mazzola, when you put your right hand down on the ground, you didn't do that two inches away or one inch away from the blood drop. You did that several feet away, didn't you?
And if your hand came into contact, the hand that touched the dirty pavement several feet away came into contact with the control swatch, it could contaminate the control swatch with whatever contaminant your right hand came in contact with, couldn't it?
Okay. And if that swatch then comes into contact with water, the water can pick up that contaminant, can't it?
And if that water then spreads outward and actually comes into contact with the bloodstain, then the bloodstain can come into contact with the very same contaminant that the right hand initially came into contact with. Isn't that a possibility?
KEY QUOTEOkay. But it's your testimony that you were never instructed to keep the control swatch moisture not in contact with the bloodstain? They never taught you that at the SID mini academy?
So is it--best of your recollection, it could have been, but you just don't recall?
Well, as you sit here today, would it make sense to you as a criminalist not to let the moisture from the control swatch come into contact with the bloodstain?
Miss Mazzola, you're having some difficulty in this swatch absorbing the bloodstain?
Now, at that point, Miss Mazzola, did you just move the swatch into the area of moisture immediately adjacent to the bloodstain where some of the control moisture was?
Did it appear to you at that point that it's touching the moisture adjacent to the stain?
Miss Mazzola, in this particular demonstration, you were asked only to make one swatch of this particular bloodstain, correct?
Now, in the--this case, in some of the blood stains, you made as many as a half dozen blood swatches?
All right. And would you agree, ma'am, that if you did, for instance, four or five swatches, there's four or five times the opportunity to make mistakes as there is in a single swatch?
In this particular demonstration, you're having some difficulty getting blood to be absorbed onto that swatch?
To dry the blood, since it was so cold, they put a heater on the blood spots and it more or less baked it onto the concrete.
And in this instance, you're actually brushing away the swatches that you actually dropped to the ground?
I believe he was back and forth between the demonstration area and the lab itself.
And there are more swatches that have dropped to the ground again, haven't there?
Would you agree that the pavement outside where you're shooting this has dirt on it, ma'am?
I notice in the demonstration board, when you're actually--when they show you either using the control swatch or swatch on a piece of evidence, you don't see any of the swatches that are lying on the ground; is that correct?
After you finished making this videotape, did the Prosecutor ask you to repeat the exercise again?
And that's because you were asked to demonstrate how it is that you put documentation on the coin envelope that you're going to put these swatches in; isn't that right?
All right. Could you stop just a second? Back up a little bit. I want you to do this in slow motion. Okay, just to--go forward now.
When you are documenting a coin envelope in the demonstration, do you put down the item number?
And when you put down the item number, do you use the number sign before the number?
Okay. And do you also on the coin envelope write down your initials as the person who was collecting this item?
I can't remember if we were taught that or if it's something we pick up. I'm not sure.
Well, if you pick something up because you learn it from more senior criminalists at the first crime scenes that you attended, that would be one way of learning this information, correct?
Another way of learning it would be because somebody at the SID mini academy explained to you this is the way to do it; is that correct?
Either way, you are learning to do something a particular way; isn't that correct?
So the question, ma'am, is, were you taught one way or the other, that when you are collecting an item, as you are in this picture, to write down your initials as well as the item number on the coin envelope?
As I believe I said earlier, some criminalists put their initials on the envelopes. Some don't.
Let's play this tape forward now in slow-mo. Just bring it up regular speed until she's about to start writing on it.
Miss Mazzola, I want you to look very carefully at the movement of your hand, of your right hand as it writes on the envelope, okay?
Since you can't see what you're writing, you just have to look at the movement. You're writing something there, correct?
So, Miss Mazzola, there are three different things that you wrote on that envelope, correct? A it appears that I have the coin envelope and the plastic envelope there together.
Miss Mazzola, did you write three different things with your hand in that down position?
Okay. And, Miss Mazzola, one of the things that you were taught to write was the number, correct?
Okay. That's the second thing. The third thing--the third thing, Miss Mazzola--and that would be, the first thing you were doing there was actually writing your initial; isn't that correct?
Miss Mazzola, when you write your initials "Am," don't you write it in one continuous motion?
Now, by the way, Miss Mazzola, you were--you wrote out the envelope and put documentation on it because that's a standard practice of yours, correct?
Yet, on the demonstration board, there is no photograph of you actually filling out the envelope, is there?
Would you agree, Miss Mazzola, that it's an important step for criminalists to document--to document the item that he or she is collecting?
And it's also important for maintaining or beginning the chain of custody; isn't that right?
Would you agree that even though you say that this is an important step in the process, that there's no photograph showing you documenting the coin envelope on this demonstration board?
Did you have any input at all into the creation of this demonstration board without a photograph of you doing the necessary documentation?
When you saw the board--you say the board had been shown to you prior to your testifying in this case, hadn't it?
Well, when you had a quick look at it, Miss Mazzola, did you say to the Prosecutor, "Wait a second. You're missing one important aspect of the bloodstain evidence collection process, namely the documentation of the coin envelope"? Did you say that to them?
You see it coming into contact with the portion of the bloodstain that moves out in an arm to the right?
One second. Can you just back it up a little bit, please, about five seconds? Stop.
Miss Mazzola, see the dirt on the fingertips of the third and fourth fingers of your glove?
Now, Miss Mazzola, do you see that you've now turned the tweezers around so the tips are right in the middle of that palm of the glove with the dirty fingers?
Do you see that the tip of the tweezers is going into that envelope into the plastic bag?
Well, Miss Mazzola, I'm not suggesting that you were cutting yourself or sticking yourself with the tweezers. But wouldn't you agree that it's possible to simply take the tweezers and hold them like this in your palm without cutting yourself (Indicating)?
You're saying that those types of tweezers are such that you can not hold them like this without cutting yourself (Indicating)? Is that your testimony?
Unless the tips were around the bottom of your hand, I can't see how you could hold the entire tweezers in your hand without getting poked.
Well, Miss Mazzola, if you have it simply resting in your hand like this and the point is down here near the bottom of your palm like this (Indicating), you wouldn't necessarily poke yourself, would you?
If the tip is actually resting on your hand such as I'm doing with my pointed pen (Indicating), I'm not poking myself, am I?
Now, Miss Mazzola, the tip of the tweezers is very close to your fingers at this point, isn't it, on your right hand? Even if the actual tip itself isn't touching, you were pretty close to the edge on that, weren't you?
You were within a half inch or quarter of an inch from the tip, weren't you, Miss Mazzola?
Now, you were having some difficulty getting the swatch to get onto the stain there, right?
And so now you've moved your fingers on the dirty glove that had been in contact with the pavement down toward the tip of those tweezers, haven't you?
I understand that. But you've moved them down away from the position they were normally in to try and get that swatch to come off the tip, haven't you?
Now, Miss Mazzola, between the collection--now you're collecting item no. 6; is that right?
Now, between the collection of item 5 and item no. 6, you never changed your gloves, did you?
And the reason you never changed your gloves is because no one at SID ever taught you to change your gloves?
They don't need to teach you when to change your gloves. You change your gloves periodically.
Well, did anyone at LAPD SID ever teach you to change your gloves between the handling of different blood stains?
KEY QUOTEOne of the procedures that you have been taught at LAPD was to put some scale in the photograph such as a tape--such as a ruler to indicate the size of the actual bloodstain, correct?
Well, were you taught as part of your instruction on forensic photography to have a ruler placed in the scene?
Miss Mazzola, did you use a ruler when doing this demonstration to indicate--for purposes of documenting the stain, the size of the stain?
Miss Mazzola, how many crime scenes have you collected bloodstains at since June 13th, 1994?
And would you agree that additional training and more experience makes you more proficient today than you were 10 months ago?
And would you agree that when collecting blood or bloodstains, mistakes can occur?
And would you agree that when collecting bloodstains, especially in evidence that's going to go out for DNA analysis, that the criminalist must understand how in the course of making different mistakes DNA could become degraded?
I don't think we bear in mind DNA specifically. We look at any serological testing.
Were you ever taught at the SID mini academy any connection at all between the mistakes that can happen at a crime scene and the effects it will have on DNA or other serological testing?
Now, the wet swatches, Miss Mazzola, were placed in the truck in brown paper bags; is that right?
Does the LAPD SID unit have a written procedure for storing biological evidence in the van?
Would you agree, Miss Mazzola, that or were you aware of the fact that the refrigerator worked at least some of the time?
And that it would work for several hours eventually before the battery going dead?
Well, have you ever been aware of the fact that it did work for more than one or two hours?
Well, would you agree, Miss Mazzola, that even a few hours of keeping wet blood swatches in the refrigerator is better than not keeping them there at all?
Well, Miss Mazzola, you said that you had been told by people at LAPD SID that heat can have some effect on bacteria growing on the blood swatches; isn't that correct?
Sustained. Counsel, I assume there's some other witness who is going to testify to these events.
Now, Miss Mazzola, when you came back to Rockingham later in the afternoon on the 13th, the first item of evidence that you collected inside the house was item no. 12; is that right?
Well, the other drops of blood that you or bloodstains that you collected from the driveway that day, they were all individual drops; were they not?
And weren't you taught, Miss Mazzola, that whenever you have distinct drops, even if they're close together, that they should be collected in separate packages?
Miss Mazzola, did you receive a handout from the SID unit entitled, "Collection and preservation of body fluids"? Do you have it?
By the way, Miss Mazzola--also look at that. Do these two pages represent a handout that you received at the SID mini academy?
Okay. And in the handout that you received from the SID mini academy, weren't you told specifically, quote, if there is more than one distinct stain, these should be treated as different stains and collected separately?
All right. And, Miss Mazzola, does it anywhere in that handout say, "Oh, but wait a second. You can make an exception if the senior criminalist says to"?
Did you ever receive any written instructions at all from LAPD SID suggesting that you could make an exception from that rule when the senior criminalist so chose?
In fact, even on the demo board that we just looked at, Miss Mazzola, items 5 and 6 are only several inches apart, aren't they?
Would you agree, Miss Mazzola, that items 5 and 6 are within a foot of one another?
And, Miss Mazzola, I believe you said that you had also been taught it wasn't necessary to pick up every single drop in a area, but only to pick up representative drops; is that correct?
In fact, other than the three drops that you saw in the foyer where you picked up item no. 12, weren't there some other small drops in the vicinity that you didn't bother to collect?
But you would agree, ma'am, that there were at least a few drops in that foyer area where you collected no. 12?
All right. And, Miss Mazzola, I believe you said that from looking at the drops outside, one could not tell which direction they were going in; isn't that correct?
I did not look at them as to try to determine directionality. I don't have any experience in that field.
I believe you said, Miss Mazzola, before that you can't tell whether or not this trail of blood drops at Rockingham is leading from the house to the Bronco or from the Bronco to the house; isn't that correct?
In fact, Miss Mazzola, from what you've just said, the greater number of drops that you saw in any particular area was that concentration of drops in the foyer inside the front door; isn't that correct?
Miss Mazzola, as a criminalist, have you learned that when a person initially cuts himself or herself, you bleed more profusely, and then as clotting occurs, the bleeding dies down? Did you learn that?
Well, Miss Mazzola, just from your common every-day experience, have you ever had a cut?
Miss Mazzola, what do you know both professionally and from your own experiences as to how frequently blood drops are made when you first get cut and how they dissipate as time passes?
Well, let me ask you this hypothetical, Miss Mazzola. If someone cut himself in the foyer of his house, might he bleed more profusely inside before going outside?
As a criminalist, Miss Mazzola, have you been trained--have you received any training at all in looking at blood pattern, any?
Well, Miss Mazzola, would you agree that the pattern of drops that you observed--that the pattern of drops that you observed on June 13th at Bundy are consistent with--
--are consistent, Miss Mazzola, with an individual cutting himself inside the house where you observed those three drops?
And isn't it true, Miss Mazzola, that that was the only blood drops or bloodstains that you observed on the first floor of the house?
And isn't it true, Miss Mazzola, that after you collected those blood drops in item no. 12 in the foyer near the front door, that you then walked up the stairway?
And as you examined that light carpet on the stairs, there was absolutely no bloodstains seen there at all, right?
And you were not only looking for blood drops at that point, you were also looking for dry flecks of blood as well, weren't you?
And you didn't see anything that was red on this white carpet ascending all the way up the stairs?
It was the kind of color that if there was a red drop, it would stand out, wouldn't it?
And then as you walked down the hallway on that second floor toward Mr. Simpson's bedroom, there was also that same light colored carpeting, correct?
And when you examined that stairway going up the stairs, ma'am, did you examine the banister also?
And also on that banister, ma'am, there were no smears of blood, were there, indicating that somebody had blood on their hands? Isn't that correct?
Did Mr. Fung in your presence say to you that he had observed any smears of blood on the banister?
Sustained. Counsel, why don't you rephrase that question; did Mr. Fung point out to you any blood smears, et cetera, et cetera.
All right. All right. Ladies and gentlemen, we're going to take our recess for the afternoon. Please remember all of my admonitions to you; don't discuss the case amongst yourselves, don't form any opinions about the case, don't allow anybody to communicate with you and do not conduct any deliberations until the matter has been submitted to you. As far as the jury is concerned, we will stand in recess until 9:00 o'clock. I'll see counsel as soon as the jury has departed.
That would be preferable.
And if that water then spreads outward and actually comes into contact with the bloodstain, then the bloodstain can come into contact with the very same contaminant that the right hand initially came into contact with. Isn't that a possibility?
No. When it is extremely cold, my left knee tends to tighten up a bit.
I had no input on the construction of the board.
Did anyone at LAPD SID ever teach you to change your gloves between the handling of different blood stains?