Your Honor for scheduling purposes, today, after Randy Petee concludes his testimony, we have three or four deposition passages to be read into the record, and then that's all we have for today. And some requests for admissions to be read to the jury.
Mr. Taft has been promised to me by the defense tomorrow morning. He hasn't been available all week. So we will resume tomorrow morning, with the Court's permission, with Bruce Weir, whose deposition is being taken this afternoon, Skip Taft, and then members of the victims' families.
All right.
The Court's going to instruct the jury with regards to Nancy Ney's testimony. I think as an oversight, yesterday, the Court should have informed the jury that her testimony was being received for the limited purpose that you offered it; that is, to show her state of mind, with regards to her state of mind as to Mr. Simpson, and also to explain her conduct with regards to what occurred at the recital prior to the death.
We would object to that, Your Honor. I think that gives the Court imprimatur that it was, in fact, Nicole Brown Simpson, and that -- that the Court ought not do it.
I objected to that testimony before it ever came in, and we still do object. We object to any of the preinstructions as attempting to cure error.
Overruled. The jury is entitled to be advised that the evidence is received for a limited purpose.
Bring the jury in.
Then we will be anticipating resting our case tomorrow.
I think that gives the Court imprimatur that it was, in fact, Nicole Brown Simpson, and that -- that the Court ought not do it.
We object to any of the preinstructions as attempting to cure error.