Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Please be seated. The record should reflect we have now been rejoined by all the members of our jury panel. All parties are again present. All right. Mr. Harmon, you may continue with your direct examination.
Your Honor, at this time I would like to have marked as 275-E, for identification, gel number AG2-44 and I will give it to Mr. Fairtlough.
And we have displayed for the jury People's 262 and 260-A which are respectively the socks results board and the sock photo board.
Now, Miss Montgomery, could you please describe, skipping over the positive and negative control--could you please describe the samples which are of interest to us in this case.
Yes. These are two samples from the sock. Umm, two different locations. And you could see them--the first one described as b-1 is a single-banded 18 and the second one described as B2 its a single-banded pattern also and that is an 18, 18.
Now, we are just showing some of the film in this case for the jury's edification; is that correct?
The result board actually lists other D1S80 results which were produced in this case. Are those in this package of film that we have as well?
Okay. Okay. Why don't we move on to 275-F, which is gel AG62-65. Could we have the glove result and photo boards, which are People's exhibit 272-A and B.
Miss Montgomery, could you, while we are getting the board set up, could you please describe the samples that were on this gel that produced the copy of the film which we have labeled 275-F?
Yes. This is DNA extracted from four different locations on the glove and G11--G11 is a mixture and this is--
There are--you need to see the original or the copy that is going to be printed out. From here it is a little difficult to see the minor contributions, but what you would see is the major banding of a 24 and so that is a major type of a 24, 24 and then you can also see a weaker 25 allele and on this one there is also a weaker 18 allele.
Could we just use some--let's stay with 18. Could we use a different color or let's sort these out by color. The 18 allele, could you put an arrow to the left of it and then we will change colors and go up to 24 and 25, so could you get it real close there. So you have got a green arrow next to the stain 9G11. That represents the 18 allele?
That is consistent with Nicole Brown. She can't be eliminated as a contributor of that weaker 18 allele.
You can tell it is a mixture for two reasons: First of all, because there are three bands present in the sample. And secondly, because of the relative intensity of the banding pattern. As I stated, that 24 is more intense than either the 18 or the 25. In this sample it appears the 18 and 25 are relatively equal intensity to each other, but yet that 24 is much stronger.
That means that there is more than one individual that could have contributed to that sample.
Okay. And from among the three individuals could you mark the 24 and 25 alleles using different colored arrows, please, to the left. So you are putting a red arrow by--to the left of--
Now, considering the three reference samples that were provided to you in this case that you didn't run on this gel, what--what can you say about the--whether or not those three--three reference types could be contained in the stain at 9G11?
None of the individuals, none of the three reference samples, O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown or Ronald Goldman, could be excluded as a source of this sample.
KEY QUOTEAnd let me ask you that same question about those three people and what is the significance about the weakness of the bands with respect to the 24 allele? Can you say anything more about how these things line up in terms of intensity?
Well, you also can--D1S80 was--I mean, DQ-Alpha was done on these samples also and by using both the DQ-Alpha results and the D1S80 results you can sort this out a little further, and--
So can you say anything more about the relative intensities in terms of the combinations of the three reference samples in this case?
I can say who could be the major contributor of the sample and who could be the minor contributor, and I can say of those three individuals none of them could be eliminated as a source of this bloodstain.
What could be the type of the major contributor in this case, based on your observations on this stain?
By looking at lane G11, glove 9, lane G11, the major contributor is a 24 homozygote and then the minor components are an 18 allele and a 25 allele.
So from among those three people, Nicole Brown, Ronald Goldman and Mr. Simpson, Mr. Simpson is the only one that has a 25 allele?
KEY QUOTEOkay. And the population frequency data actually describes how many other people might have the 25 allele?
Okay. Let's move on to G12. Could you describe, before you put any arrows on it, describe the band that you are able to see on the original and the blue copy that appear in 9G12 if you will?
Yes. G12 is also a mixture and from here I'm having a difficult time seeing that--the minor contributor, but the minor type, if you--when you look at the gel you will see an 18 band in the 18 region. Umm, so in this sample the major contributor is a 24 homozygote and the minor contributor has an 18 allele present.
And are those two types consistent with the two victims in this case, Mr. Goldman and Miss Brown?
When you say, "Major contributor, minor contributor," are you saying that it is a mixture of those two types?
By major and minor I am able to say what the major type is. As far as the minor components, what I can say is an 18 allele is the minor component but that 18 could be an 18 homozygote or it could be a 18, 24.
So it could be just a one-banded 18 pattern which would be consistent with Nicole Brown?
Or there might be another 24 band that is hidden under the 24 band? Is that what you are saying?
Okay. Can we try to get some arrows in that--let's keep green with the 18, if you will.
Okay. Let's move over to G13. Will you describe what you see there and then we will discuss it.
Yes. G13 is similar to G11. The interpretation is the same on that sample where it is a mixture, there is more than one band present. There is a major type and there are minor alleles. The major type is a 24, 24 and the minor alleles are an 18 and a 25. And once again, you need to see the printed out copy.
Okay. Now, let's look back on G11. The results that you have described for G13, are they essentially the same results as you have seen in G11?
Umm, the 25 and the 18 are slightly weaker in G13, but in general the same pattern--the same pattern is seen in G13 as G11.
And would you--strike that. So the comments that you made about G11 would apply to G13 as well?
Could we, using the same colors that we used in G11, could we try to get some arrows in there to show where those bands are.
Now, you have got the pink arrow on the 25 allele in G13. And then you have marked the 18 allele with the green arrow?
Once again, in this sample from among the three reference types that were provided to you, Mr. Simpson is the only one that has that 25 allele; is that correct?
G14--G14 has a major contribution of a 24 homozygote and in the 18 region there is what I call a possible 18. There wasn't a clear distinct band in that region so I wasn't confident to call it a band.
Is there something that is more readily apparent if you actually look at the original and look the copy?
From here I can't see anything in that region. When you look at the original gel or the copy of the gel, what you could see is a darkening in that region, but as I stated, it is not clearly defined and I would not call it definitely an 18 band being present.
There is a major--there is a 24 allele present, so the mayor source of the sample is a 24 homozygote.
And I believe Mr. Sims described, because of that possible trace 18, that one could not exclude Nicole Brown?
If that is a band, then no, Nicole Brown could not be eliminated, but as I was saying, I don't feel confident calling it a band, so if it is a band, then she can't be excluded, but since I won't call that a definite band, then that is--
So that was--so this one I am able to say what the major type is on the sample. As far as minor contributor, I am unable to say anything about it.
Okay. So let's look at what you do see there. Who is not excluded as the source of this stain on G14?
I could not eliminate Ronald Goldman as being a possible source since he is a 24 homozygote and the pattern that is seen in G14 is 24, 24.
I would like to move on--I'm going to display the nail board, your Honor, with those photos at the bottom, the nail kit and the other photos.
And as well as the Bundy result board. The nail board is People's exhibit 220 and the Bundy result board is 259.
And at the same time I would like to have marked as 275-G for identification gel a G293.
I just want to make sure my recollection is--yeah. Mr. Bancroft, would you avoid 220, please.
Okay. While Mr. Fairtlough is getting the board set up, could you describe the samples of interest that were provided to you for D1S80 typing in this case?
Yes. These were extracted samples from the fingernail scrapings of Nicole Simpson--Nicole Brown.
And as soon as we get the board up there, we can relate the items, because it doesn't seem like we have enough room there. Why don't we slide the--could you justify in parenthesis and describe the items so the jury can correlate them. What is your 45B number which is labeled fingernail--fingernail 84 and then in parenthesis 45B? What is that?
45A is the right fingernail clippings. 1B refers to nearby blood on the same nail.
Okay. And would you describe, starting from left to right, 45B, what results did you obtain with the D1S80 marker when you typed your no. 45B?
Could we use--I think we have been using green for the 18 allele. Could you put an arrow for each of the three sample that gave you the sale result, the 18 allele?
Okay. Is there any question in your mind that they are the same result for all three of those samples?
And the last--if--board and results, if we can keep the Bundy result board up there and put the Bundy photo board, which is People's exhibit 165 up there, at the same time I would like to have marked as People's 275-H for identification gel a G295.
Now, Miss Montgomery, what I would like to talk about is items 115, 116 and 117 so as not to confuse them with photo I.d. Numbers which are in the upper left-hand corner and then just down below it, the items from the rear gate at Bundy.
And could you please describe your results and then I will ask you to mark them, if you will.
Okay. And would you move over to 116 and describe the results that you obtained on 116.
Okay. And on the 117, the rear gate stain, could you describe the results and put arrows to show where they are.
Yes, the same results were obtained with sample 117 and that is a 24 allele and a 25. (Witness complies.)
Okay. Are those results--strike that. Is 115 consistent with Mr. Simpson's D1S80 type?
Are those three types, three results, 115, 116, 117, are they consistent with one another?
Are all three of those results inconsistent with having come from Ronald Goldman alone?
Well, yes, because by using--by looking at the D1S80 results and also by looking at the DQ-Alpha results, there is no indication that a mixture is present here and so on this the type of the individual will be a 24, 25.
Now, did anything happen in the course of your testing on all the samples that you have tested in this case that undermines your confidence in the results that both you and Mr. Sims have been presenting?
And as I mentioned, there are a number of other films that have not been shown to the jury?
None of the individuals, none of the three reference samples, O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown or Ronald Goldman, could be excluded as a source of this sample.
So from among those three people, Nicole Brown, Ronald Goldman and Mr. Simpson, Mr. Simpson is the only one that has a 25 allele?
These all came back 24, 25, and as you can see—
I don't feel confident calling it a band, so if it is a band, then she can't be excluded, but since I won't call that a definite band, then that is—