NO. WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A RECESS AT THIS POINT. ALL RIGHT.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A RECESS AT THIS POINT. PLEASE REMEMBER MY ADMONITIONS TO YOU. DON'T DISCUSS THE CASE AMONGST YOURSELVES, FORM ANY OPINIONS ABOUT THE CASE, CONDUCT MY DELIBERATIONS OR ALLOW ANYBODY TO CONTACT YOU. WE WILL BE IN RECESS UNTIL 1:30. I WOULD LIKE COUNSEL HERE AT 1:30. MR. PARK, YOU ARE EXCUSED UNTIL 1:30. ALL RIGHT. PLEASE REMEMBER MY OTHER ORDERS.
BACK ON THE RECORD IN THE SIMPSON MATTER. ALL PARTIES ARE AGAIN PRESENT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MISS CLARK. MR. COCHRAN, YOU WISH TO BE HEARD?
I WOULD LIKE TO BE HEARD IF I MIGHT. I WOULD ASK LEAVE THE COURT TO ASK MR. PARK A QUESTION REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR BAG, WHICH I WOULD LIKE TO MARK AND ASK HIM WHETHER OR NOT THIS PARTICULAR BAG I HAVE IN MY LEFT HAND HERE APPEARS SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SHAPE AND COLOR TO THE BAG THAT HE SAW FROM ABOUT TWENTY FEET ON THE DRIVEWAY. I THINK THAT THIS BAG BELONGED TO OR BELONGS TO MR. SIMPSON AND MAY HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE BAGS THAT HE TOOK TO CHICAGO ON THAT NIGHT. AND I THINK THE COURT IS AWARE ALSO THAT MR. PARK HAS PREVIOUSLY SEEN THIS BAG AND INDICATED THAT IT APPARENTLY IS -- COMPORTS OR IS SIMILAR IN SIZE AND SHAPE AND COLOR TO THE BAG THAT HE SAW FROM SOME TWENTY FEET AWAY. HE CAN'T SAY DEFINITELY. AND I ASK LEAVE THE COURT, IN VIEW OF THE TACT TAKEN BY THE PROSECUTION REGARDING THIS BAG, TO BE ALLOWED TO ASK THAT QUESTION IN THE PRESENCE OF THE JURY.
WELL, AS I UNDERSTOOD THE OFFER OF PROOF COUNSEL MADE AT SIDE BAR IS THAT MR. SIMPSON SAID THAT THE BAG MIGHT HAVE BEEN A BAG HE TOOK TO CHICAGO, HE DOESN'T KNOW, HE CAN'T SAY FOR SURE. HE THINKS IT IS HIS BAG. HE HAS A LOT OF BAGS. WELL, THAT DOESN'T GIVE -- THAT IS NO OFFER OF PROOF. THAT IS NOT MUCH MORE THAN SPECULATION. IT IS A COMPLETE NON-COMMITTAL ON THE PART OF THE DEFENSE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THAT BAG IS THE ONE THAT WAS TAKEN TO CHICAGO, AND THEY OUGHT NOT TO JUST THROW THINGS UP HERE IN FRONT OF THIS WITNESS.
IT IS LITTLE MORE THAN TRICKERY. BEYOND THAT, THE BAG IS NEW AND IT IS APPARENT THAT NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN PLACED INSIDE THE BAG. THE KEYS ARE STILL ATTACHED TO THE BAG AND THE LITTLE PLASTIC STRING THAT ONCE -- TO WHICH WAS ONCE ATTACHED THE PRICE TAG I GUESS IS STILL ON THE BAG. THE BAG WAS RECOVERED JUST TODAY, I BELIEVE AT ELEVEN O'CLOCK THIS MORNING, FROM MR. KARDASHIAN'S HOME.
KEY QUOTEYESTERDAY. IT IS IRRELEVANT. IT IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. THIS BAG HAS -- HELPS US, IT DOES NOT HELP THE JURY --
AND AS MISS CLARK HAS REMINDED ME THERE COULD BE MILLIONS OF BAGS THAT PERHAPS FIT THE DESCRIPTION GIVEN BY MR. PARK, AND MR. PARK HAS TOLD THE COURT AT SIDE BAR AND HE HAS TOLD THE JURY AS WELL THAT HE DID NOT GET A GOOD LOOK AT THE BAG. HIS MEMORY IS SOMEWHAT VAGUE AS TO WHAT THE BAG LOOKED LIKE EXACTLY. I MEAN, IT COULD BE, IT COULDN'T BE. WHERE DOES THAT GET US? HOW IS THAT RELEVANT? SO WE WOULD OBJECT TO REPRESENTING THAT BAG TO THE JURY.
THE IDEA THAT IT IS VERY HARD FOR THE PROSECUTORS TO EVER ARGUE EVERYTHING WITHOUT LABELING EVERYTHING. TRICKERY COMES FROM THESE VAGUE THEORIES THAT CHANGE LIKE THE WEATHER.
YOUR HONOR, IF THE COURT PLEASES, I'M ASKING LEAVE OF THE COURT, BASED ON THE REPRESENTATION AND BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THIS BAG WAS RECOVERED BY JUDGE WONG YESTERDAY -- AND I WANT TO ASK MR. WONG ABOUT IT. YOUR HONOR, THIS MATTER WAS BROUGHT UP -- COULD MR. DARDEN PLEASE SIT DOWN AND STOP MAKING SOUNDS.
NOW, YOUR HONOR, MAY I PROCEED? WITH REGARD TO THE PROSECUTION'S QUESTIONING OF BOTH MR. PARK AND MR. KATO KAELIN, IN THIS INSTANCE THESE BAGS, ALL THESE BAGS WERE RECOVERED. THEY WERE NOT RECOVERED BY THE PEOPLE. THESE BAGS WERE BROUGHT FORWARD BY THE DEFENSE WITH THE HELP OF THIS COURT BY THE SPECIAL MASTER AND THEY ARE NOW IN THE COURT'S CUSTODY. I WANT PURELY TO ASK THE QUESTION THE COURT KNOWS THAT I WANT TO ASK. I HAVE ASKED MR. PARK. I GUESS PROBATIVE VALUE. IT DOESN'T GO TO ANY WEIGHT. IT DOESN'T GO TO ADMISSIBILITY, RATHER, IT GOES TO ANY WEIGHT. EVERYBODY KNOWS HE WAS TWENTY FEET AWAY. HE WAS TWENTY FEET AWAY WHEN THEY WERE ASKING ALL THOSE QUESTIONS, TOO, BUT FAIR IS FAIR. YOU CAN'T ALLOW THEM, IT SEEMS TO ME, TO DO ALL THESE THINGS AND NOT ALLOW US AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW WHAT MIGHT VERY WELL HAVE BEEN THE BAG. AND THAT IS ALL WE ARE ASKING TO DO YOUR HONOR. I THINK IT IS ENTIRELY APPROPRIATE. WITH REGARD TO THE OTHER BAG HE CAN'T IDENTIFY, I'M NOT ASKING ANYTHING REGARDING THAT AND I WOULD LIKE TO CONCLUDED MY CROSS-EXAMINATION WITH THAT.
THIS OFFER OF PROOF DOES NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL OF WHAT VERY WELL MIGHT HAVE BEEN. MR. SIMPSON KNOWS WHICH BAG HE TOOK TO CHICAGO. HE HASN'T SAID THAT THIS IS THE ONE, AND GIVEN THAT, THE DEFENSE SHOULD BE PRECLUDED FROM JUST THROWING THINGS UP HERE IN FRONT OF THE WITNESSES WHEN THEY THROW THEORIES AROUND THE COURTROOM, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY HAVE A FACTUAL BASIS FOR THEM, AND NOW THEY WANT TO DO THE SAME THING WITH THIS BAG. IT IS IRRELEVANT. IT HAS NO PROBATIVE VALUE WHATSOEVER. MR. COCHRAN IS MAKING SOUNDS BEHIND MY BACK, YOUR HONOR.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I'M GOING TO SUSTAIN THE 352 OBJECTION FOR THIS REASON: THE OFFER OF PROOF WAS THIS COULD POSSIBLY BE AND THE STATEMENT BY MR. PARK WITH COUNSEL AT SIDE BAR "THAT DOES NOT LOOK FAMILIAR," BUT HE COULDN'T TELL, YOU HAVE -- IT IS TOO SPECULATIVE AT THIS POINT AND THE DANGER OF MISLEADING THE JURY IS APPARENT. AND THE COURT WILL SUSTAIN THE OBJECTION.
YOUR HONOR, MAY I BE HEARD? MY UNDERSTANDING REGARDING WHAT MR. PARK SAID -- MY UNDERSTANDING MR. PARK -- AND I WOULD ASK THE COURT TO ASK HIM WHAT HE SAID -- WAS THAT IT WAS SIMILAR IN BOTH SIZE, SHAPE AND COLOR AND THAT HE WAS TWENTY FEET AWAY.
COUNSEL, I'VE GOT EIGHT BAGS IN MY CHAMBERS THAT ARE THE SAME GENERAL COLOR, GENERAL SIZE.
KEY QUOTEI DID. I HEARD VERY CAREFULLY. I LISTENED TO MR. PARK VERY CAREFULLY. THANK YOU, COUNSEL.
I DO STILL HAVE JUDGE WONG HERE AVAILABLE, BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO GET OUT OF HERE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
JUDGE WONG IS STILL HERE. HE WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE, THOUGH, BECAUSE HE HAS ANOTHER APPOINTMENT.
IT IS LITTLE MORE THAN TRICKERY. BEYOND THAT, THE BAG IS NEW AND IT IS APPARENT THAT NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN PLACED INSIDE THE BAG. THE KEYS ARE STILL ATTACHED TO THE BAG AND THE LITTLE PLASTIC STRING THAT ONCE -- TO WHICH WAS ONCE ATTACHED THE PRICE TAG I GUESS IS STILL ON THE BAG.
I'VE GOT EIGHT BAGS IN MY CHAMBERS THAT ARE THE SAME GENERAL COLOR, GENERAL SIZE.
FAIR IS FAIR. YOU CAN'T ALLOW THEM, IT SEEMS TO ME, TO DO ALL THESE THINGS AND NOT ALLOW US AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW WHAT MIGHT VERY WELL HAVE BEEN THE BAG.
I'M GOING TO SUSTAIN THE 352 OBJECTION FOR THIS REASON: THE OFFER OF PROOF WAS THIS COULD POSSIBLY BE AND THE STATEMENT BY MR. PARK WITH COUNSEL AT SIDE BAR 'THAT DOES NOT LOOK FAMILIAR,' BUT HE COULDN'T TELL, YOU HAVE -- IT IS TOO SPECULATIVE AT THIS POINT AND THE DANGER OF MISLEADING THE JURY IS APPARENT.