YOUR HONOR, I'VE BEEN TALKING OVER THE LUNCH HOUR WITH MR. BLASIER AND MR. NEUFELD ABOUT THE COURT'S ORDER REGARDING EXPERT WITNESSES. AND BECAUSE OUR EXPERTS ARE IN DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE COUNTRY, WE WOULD LIKE SOME MORE TIME. SECOND, WE WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT THE MATTER TO THE COURT IN CAMERA BEFORE YOU MAKE ANY ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE UNDER 1054.7. WE WOULD ASK UNTIL MONDAY FOR THE IN CAMERA AND THEN THE END OF MONDAY, TUESDAY AT THE LATEST FOR THE DISCLOSURE. PROBABLY MONDAY FOR BOTH. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN IN CAMERA ON MONDAY, THEN DISCLOSURE IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER IF THE COURT PLEASES.

YOUR HONOR, THE COURT ISSUED AN ORDER. WE'RE ALREADY WHAT, TWO MONTHS INTO TRIAL. WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR DISCOVERY WE OUGHT TO HAVE. OPENING STATEMENT WAS DURING THE LAST WEEK OF JANUARY, AND WE STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN ANY INFORMATION. THE COURT ISSUED AN ORDER. I THOUGHT WE HAD AN AGREEMENT. THE COURT ISSUED ITS RULING. IT'S INHERENTLY UNFAIR TO CAUSE ANY ADDITIONAL DELAY. EXPERTS ARE COMING UP PROBABLY WITHIN THE NEXT 10 DAYS. WE NEED TIME TO READ THIS STUFF AND TO DIGEST IT. ANY ADDITIONAL DELAY IS UNFAIR AND IS GOING TO CAUSE DELAY IN PROCEEDING. THE COURT'S ALREADY RULED.