Dr. Weir, in terms of your analysis, you examined two databases from Cellmark; is that right?
That's right. The one that they used in their own reports and the subsequent one developed in 1994.
And was that what was referred I believe last week to the `92--1992 Cellmark database as well as the 1994 Cellmark database?
So in your analysis of the various databases used in this case, would it be correct to say you examined three separate databases?
For the PCR, Cellmark has--has the Caucasian and African American, and the FBI has the four racial designations.
And did you evaluate the evidence in this case on all of these results boards using and comparing all of those databases?
I didn't use the Cellmark's PCR data, but I used all the Cellmark's RFLP, all the FBI's RFLP and all the FBI's PCR on all the items on the boards.
As a result of your comparison of those databases, is it your opinion that the RFLP results on all of these boards where they exist are in fact good estimates?
As far as these databases and comparing results from each of them, do they in fact demonstrate the fact that these various RFLP profiles for the three known individuals in this case are very rare?
Well, I'd like to rephrase that the profiles found in the evidentiary items are very rare and they--they match the three known people.
KEY QUOTEI'd like to rephrase that the profiles found in the evidentiary items are very rare and they--they match the three known people.
Well, I also examined the Cellmark PCR. So it's actually four.