Over at the side bar. Mr. Kelberg, you told me two more questions after the videotape.
Your Honor, I did not expect his answer to be--I did not expect his answer, which I think the Court will recognize, went on for probably about two and a half minutes, unabated, after I asked the simple question regarding the motivational video. He has thrown in the kitchen sink in an effort--as an advocate--as the jury will see, is as an advocate rather than as a physician.
The only thing that I think we are going to do is we have the tape from yesterday, as I understand it, that will show--
We are going to see if it shows him present. The Court may think it is collateral.
Yes, Mr. Shapiro. I'm sorry, you needed to make your record on an objection previously.
To paraphrase the former chief Judge of the federal district court, cross-examination is not a marathon, and this witness is called for limited purposes. This cross-examination is now approaching a record, just as the direct examination of Mr. Kelberg broke all existing records, that we also believe that under 352 that the Court should exercise its discretion in controlling the flow of this case, and that the only object of Mr. Kelberg's cross-examination, which sometimes in my opinion borders on the ludicrous, is to slow down the pace of the Defense, which we have told the Court we want to finish in three to four weeks, to throw off our flow of witnesses and to accomplish nothing other than to bore the jury and engage in some type of private conversation with the doctor.
All it is going to say--let's face it, it is really a fine point without a distinction. If it is rheumatoid arthritis in his knee or if it is osteoarthritis in his knee, it is still arthritis, and we agree that looking at the railroad tracks on the side of his knee and looking at the number of hits the guy took, he probably has got knee problems. He has got kneemonia.
Your Honor, I will accept all that, but the issue is this doctor now wants to make it out that he had an acute onset of rheumatoid arthritis that would have prevented him on June 12--
Well, he is suggesting it. That is the inference that he wants the jury to draw. And the question is, is he credible--is he credible in forming such an opinion? I find this doctor--
Counsel, you've got a videotape of Mr. Simpson walking down the sidewalk on June the 12th at the recital where he is not limping. You've got this exercise video where he is jumping around all day and he is making these arm motions and all this kind of stuff. The Prosecution's theory is that they cornered Mr. Goldman in that little cage. You don't need to chase the guy down. You caught him.
KEY QUOTEMiss Clark, I'm not worried about that, but I think we've already made our point here is the point I'm trying to make.
You made the point that there were many other injuries on the back of the left hand. That was great stuff.
I'm not disputing the Court's observations. I just think that Mr. Shapiro's outrageous statements--
I would also object, since they don't want to be here, to the playing of the Juice Plus video, as beyond the scope of direct examination as being--as being a 352 objection and that it should not be--we are practicing law while you are joking.
I don't think I want to hear any more of this, and I think that the Court ought to shut Mr. Shapiro down before those personal remarks are made. I thought that was not going to be allowed.
If it is rheumatoid arthritis in his knee or if it is osteoarthritis in his knee, it is still arthritis, and we agree that looking at the railroad tracks on the side of his knee and looking at the number of hits the guy took, he probably has got knee problems. He has got kneemonia.
You've got a videotape of Mr. Simpson walking down the sidewalk on June the 12th at the recital where he is not limping... The Prosecution's theory is that they cornered Mr. Goldman in that little cage. You don't need to chase the guy down. You caught him.
The only object of Mr. Kelberg's cross-examination, which sometimes in my opinion borders on the ludicrous, is to slow down the pace of the Defense... to throw off our flow of witnesses and to accomplish nothing other than to bore the jury and engage in some type of private conversation with the doctor.
Eight days of cross on Tom Lange.
Is it only allowed on one side?