PRIOR TO THAT MOTION I BELIEVE WE NEGLECTED TO MOVE INTO EVIDENCE THE PEOPLE'S EXHIBITS THAT WERE INTRODUCED OR MARKED AT LEAST DURING THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HEARING WHICH TOOK PLACE OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS, SO I WOULD, ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE, MOVE INTO EVIDENCE I BELIEVE IT IS PEOPLE'S 1 THROUGH 10.
IN ADDITION, THERE IS FORTHCOMING TO THE COURT VERY SHORTLY THE NOTEBOOK WHICH WE HAD PROMISED THE COURT. WHAT IS THE COURT'S PLEASURE? SHOULD THAT BE MARKED PEOPLE'S 11?
YOUR HONOR, THERE WERE INDEED I BELIEVE A COUPLE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED DISCOVERY MATTERS REMAINING AT THE END OF THE DAY YESTERDAY. DOES THE COURT WISH --
WE WILL TAKE UP THE MISCELLANEOUS DISCOVERY MATTERS. WE STILL HAVE -- AFTER WE FINISH WITH THE FUHRMAN MOTION, WE HAVE ARGUMENT -- I INDICATED I WOULD HEAR ARGUMENT AND ISSUE RULINGS TODAY ON THE JUROR ISSUES THAT WE HAD DISCUSSED IN CHAMBERS AND THEN TAKE UP ANY MISCELLANEOUS DISCOVERY MATTERS THAT ARE STILL HANGING, SO IT IS ON THE AGENDA FOR TODAY.
YOUR HONOR, I THINK WE NEED MR. COCHRAN BEFORE WE BEGIN THIS MOTION. HE WILL BE PARTICIPATING AS CO-COUNSEL.
KEY QUOTEWELL, LET'S HOLD OFF ON THAT UNTIL WE SEE WHAT IT IS.
I THINK WE NEED MR. COCHRAN BEFORE WE BEGIN THIS MOTION. HE WILL BE PARTICIPATING AS CO-COUNSEL.