I JUST WANT TO FIND OUT IF THE INTERPRETER IS HERE, IF THE SALVADORIAN INTERPRETER IS HERE.
THE OTHER POINT IS WHILE WE ARE UP HERE, AND I HAD ASKED BEFORE ABOUT THIS QUESTION OF SCOPE OF CROSS, AND THAT IS WHY I WANTED TO ASK ABOUT THAT, AND THE THIRD THING, I SEE THERE ARE TWO CAMERAS. THE D.A.'S HAVE A CAMERA AND THE COURT CAMERA?
FOR THE COURT. THE D.A.'S OFFICE INDICATED THEY WANTED THEIR OWN PERSON TO TAKE ONE SO THAT THEY IMMEDIATELY HAVE A COPY. I WILL MAKE YOU A COPY.
WE WILL ALSO HAVE THE COURT T.V. COPY, SO THERE WILL BE THREE DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THIS.
THE SECURITY CAMERA UP THERE DOESN'T ACCURATELY RECORD THE QUESTIONS OF THE WITNESSES. I MEAN OF THE QUESTIONER.
AND THE ANGLE, IS IT -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT KIND OF ANGLE IT GIVES ON THE WITNESS, THE SECURITY CAMERA. IS IT GOOD?
THE REASON I ASKED SHULMAN TO SET UP IN THE JURY BOX WAS BECAUSE THAT IS THE VIEW THE JURY WOULD SEE.
KEY QUOTESO I MEAN, IF WE HAD AN EMPTY COURTROOM, IF ALL THINGS WERE PERFECT, WE COULD DO EVERYTHING.
SO, JUDGE, WHILE WE ARE WAITING ON THE INTERPRETER, WHAT ABOUT THE SCOPE OF CROSS ON THIS SITUATION?
BUT I HAVE TO TELL YOU, I THINK PART OF THE PROBLEM FROM MY SENSE IS THAT THE WITNESS WAS LISTENING TO THE ENGLISH QUESTION AND SIMULTANEOUSLY LISTENING TO THE SPANISH INTERPRETATION.
THE PROBLEM, THOUGH, THAT WE WERE AWARE OF, IS THE TRANSLATOR WAS INTERPRETING INSTEAD OF TRANSLATING WHAT SHE WAS SAYING AND CHANGING WORDS AND CLEANING UP HER LANGUAGE, NOT EVEN INTERPRETING SOME OF THE THINGS SHE WAS SAYING AT ALL.
YOU MEAN ABOUT EVIL EYE? YOU MEAN THE EVIL EYE? SHE SAID YOU WERE GIVING HER THE EVIL EYE.
I DON'T KNOW, MARCIA. YOU ARE GIVING IT TO ME RIGHT NOW, I WANT THE RECORD TO REFLECT.
I DON'T KNOW IF SHE FEELS COMFORTABLE ENOUGH TO DO IT IN ENGLISH.
DON'T LET CARL ASK HER ANY QUESTIONS. HE DOESN'T SPEAK ENGLISH WELL HIMSELF.
KEY QUOTEWE ARE GOING TO BE ABOUT FIVE MINUTES. CAN WE GO SOMEWHERE ELSE AND ASK HER ABOUT THIS AND THE SCOPE OF CROSS? AND I WANTED TO ASK YOU ABOUT ... REQUEST, IF YOU FORMULATED ANY PLAN.
I WAS HOPING TO TAKE CARE OF BOTH ... AND ... TODAY, BUT OBVIOUSLY WE GOT SIDETRACKED, BUT I WANT TO BRING THEM IN INDIVIDUALLY AND TALK TO BOTH OF THEM.
I THINK WE SHOULD CHECK ON THAT. CAN WE GET SOME IDEA OF WHERE WE ARE ON THE SCOPE OF CROSS, YOUR HONOR?
WELL, IT DEPENDS ON WHAT THEY ASK. IT IS KIND OF HARD TO SAY AT THIS POINT. YOU KNOW, 220, I ASSUME THAT THEY ARE GOING TO TRY TO COME AFTER HER ABOUT THE EQUIVOCATION OF WHEN SHE WAS GOING TO LEAVE OR NOT, AND 220 DOES TALK ABOUT YOUR ATTITUDE ABOUT GIVING TESTIMONY AND PARTICIPATING AS A WITNESS, SO I MEAN THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS COVERED IN 220, BUT I DON'T WANT TO GO INTO IT AD INFINITUM. THAT IS WORTH FIVE MINUTE'S WORTH OF QUESTIONS.
I DOUBT IF IT IS WORTH MUCH, BUT I JUST WANT TO GET A SENSE OF HOW FAR -- SINCE YOU RULED THAT SHE IS ALLOWED TO TESTIFY, HOW RELEVANT DOES ALL THAT BECOME?
I WILL MAKE THE APPROPRIATE OBJECTION, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE COURT TO HAVE THAT IN MIND WITH REGARD TO WHERE THE DIRECT GOES AND WHAT THE CROSS IS ABOUT.
DON'T FORGET, TOO, THAT THIS IS SORT OF A DRY RUN, BUT IT IS STILL SUBJECT TO OBJECTION AND WHATEVER. I MADE THE POINT ON THE RECORD THAT I'M SITTING AS A MAGISTRATE AT THIS POINT DURING THE 1335 AND YOU CAN STILL LODGE OBJECTIONS AT THE PRESENTATION AT TRIAL. SO I ALSO RAISE THE ISSUE ON 770 AS TO HOW MUCH YOUR INVESTIGATION HAS UNCOVERED, BECAUSE EITHER THE PERSON HAS TO STILL BE AVAILABLE AS A WITNESS OR HAVE BEEN CONFRONTED WITH IT.
WE HAVE NOT GOTTEN ANY DISCOVERY FROM THEM ABOUT ANY -- ANYTHING OF THIS NATURE, SO, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IT PUTS US IN A -- YOU HAVEN'T GIVEN US ANY REPORTS OF ALL THIS INVESTIGATION YOU GUYS HAVE DONE ON ROSA. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT.
I AM MINDFUL OF THAT, BUT THEN INFORMATION THAT YOU GET TO IMPEACH -- DIRECTLY IMPEACH THE OTHER SIDE'S WITNESS IS NOT NECESSARILY DISCOVERABLE UNTIL THAT TIME COMES AROUND, ALTHOUGH THAT SHOULD BE SHORTLY.
THE RECORD IS CLEAR THAT WE HAD TURNED OVER AN AUGUST REPORT OF MISS LOPEZ, AND MAY I HAVE A COPY OF THAT?
YES, UH-HUH. IT DOESN'T REFLECT WHAT YOU REPRESENTED IN YOUR OPENING STATEMENT, BUT WE HAVE ONE.
KEY QUOTEYOU KNOW, IT CUTS OFF IN THE MIDDLE OF SENTENCES AND DOT, DOT, DOT, AND PICKS UP LATER. YOU KNOW, WHERE IS REST OF IT?
I PRESUME YOU GOT WHAT WE GOT. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH DISCOVERY. I ASSUME YOU GOT WHAT WE GOT. INCOMPLETE DOT, DOT, DOT? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
SENTENCES TRAIL OFF, THEY DON'T END AND IT DOT, DOT, DOT, DOT, AND THEN PICKS UP AGAIN. IT IS A STYLE I ASSUME OF THE INVESTIGATOR WHO WROTE IT.
YOU ARE GIVING IT TO ME RIGHT NOW, I WANT THE RECORD TO REFLECT.
DON'T LET CARL ASK HER ANY QUESTIONS. HE DOESN'T SPEAK ENGLISH WELL HIMSELF.
WE ARE NOT THE ONES RUNNING FROM IT. TAKE YOUR BEST SHOT.
IT DOESN'T REFLECT WHAT YOU REPRESENTED IN YOUR OPENING STATEMENT, BUT WE HAVE ONE.
THE REASON I ASKED SHULMAN TO SET UP IN THE JURY BOX WAS BECAUSE THAT IS THE VIEW THE JURY WOULD SEE.