BACK ON THE RECORD AT THE SIMPSON RESIDENCE. MISS CLARK, YOU HAD SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO MENTION FOR THE RECORD?

YES, YOUR HONOR. I WAS INFORMED BY MR. GORDON THAT HE -- DIRECTLY AFTER THE COURT ISSUED ITS ADMONITION NOT TO LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS AND NOT TO CONSIDER THEM, MR. GORDON ACCOMPANIED A GROUP OF JURORS ON TOUR THROUGH THE HOUSE AND JUROR NUMBER I BELIEVE IT WAS 620 HE INDICATED TO ME STUDIED EACH AND EVERY PHOTOGRAPH VERY CAREFULLY IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS. I WOULD ASK FOR PERMISSION FROM THE COURT TO HAVE MR. GORDON ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF HIS OBSERVATIONS DIRECTLY IF HE MAY.

MR. GORDON.

JUDGE, I WAS NOTICING BOTH DOWN IN THE FOYER BEFORE GOING UP THE HALLWAY, THE JUROR WAS STUDYING THE PHOTOGRAPHS ON THE WALL AS WE WENT UP AND THEN WITHIN THE MASTER BEDROOM ITSELF.

MAY I INDICATE SOMETHING? I WAS IN THAT GROUP AND I SAW NO. 602 LOOK AT SOME PHOTOGRAPHS TOO. BUT I THOUGHT THE ADMONITION WAS NOT TO PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THEM, TREAT THEM AS THOUGH THEY WEREN'T THERE. I DON'T THINK -- I THOUGHT BY THE COURT'S CURATIVE ADMONITION -- I'M SURE EVERY LAWYER THAT WENT WITH ONE OF THE GROUPS SAW SOME JURORS LOOKING AT THE WALLS. THE QUESTION IS -- THE COURT HAD ALREADY TOLD THEM TO DISREGARD THEM, THAT THEY'RE NOT PART OF THE EVIDENCE. SO THAT'S MY RESPONSE. I SAW 602 SEEMED VERY QUIZZITIVE LOOKING AT PICTURES DOWNSTAIRS AND ON THE WAY UP ON THE WALL. I DIDN'T MAKE A BIG THING OF IT BECAUSE YOU TOLD THEM TO DISREGARD THAT STAFF.

THAT'S CORRECT. AND THAT'S THE REASON I BROUGHT IT TO MISS CLARK'S ATTENTION. IT WASN'T JUST SOMEONE LOOKING IN PASSING. IT WAS SOMEONE TAKING THE EFFORT TO, BEFORE HE WENT UP THE STAIRS, TO LOOK AT EACH ONE, AND THEN AS WE WENT UP, LOOK AT EACH ONE, AND WITHIN THE BEDROOM, GO AROUND EACH SIDE, EACH END TABLE, STUDY THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WERE ON THE END TABLES.

AS I SAID, I WAS NOT IN THAT GROUP. MR. SHAPIRO WAS. I WENT ON THE FIRST TWO GROUPS, AND I SAW JURORS LOOKING AT THE WALLS BUT DIDN'T -- WAS OF NO MOMENT BECAUSE I WAS ON THE BUS WHEN YOU TOLD THEM TO DISREGARD IT, WHATEVER. LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE, WHEN YOU STRIKE SOMETHING, WE ASSUME THEY WILL IN GOOD FAITH. I SEE THIS AS NO MOMENT. THE COURT MADE IT VERY CLEAR.

DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY OBSERVATIONS THEY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE?

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING FROM OUR STANDPOINT. I WOULD LIKE TO COMPLIMENT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND THE LAPD AND THE COURT STAFF FOR PUTTING THIS TOGETHER IN RECORD TIME. AND FROM MY STANDPOINT, EVERYTHING WENT VERY SMOOTHLY AND SOMEONE DESERVES A LOT OF CREDIT FOR THAT. I THOUGHT I WOULD SAY THAT FOR THE RECORD.

ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? THEN, COUNSEL, IF THERE ARE NO OBJECTIONS, I AM GOING TO TAKE ONE COUNSEL FROM EACH PARTY TO COME ON THE BUS WITH THE COURT REPORTER. I'M GOING TO EXCUSE THE JURORS AND ADMONISH THEM AND ORDER THEM TO RECONVENE ON TUESDAY MORNING. ALL RIGHT. THEN AFTER I ACCOMPLISH THAT, COUNSEL WILL BE EXCUSED AND THE COURT STAFF WILL RETURN TO THE COURTHOUSE.