He was, your Honor, but I will appear in his stead. Mr. Harris is presently attempting to print out the written objections that we have, but I can orally explain to the Court what our concerns are.
Yes, your Honor. Mr. Hodgman will be here momentarily. We are talking about the view?
This is something that I would like to resolve as soon as possible, because if any modifications need to be made, I would like to have more time to do it. And if we decide to cancel it, we can plan to do something else Sunday night.
Your Honor, I have not received any offer of stipulation from the Defense concerning foundation for the print expert.
Your Honor, that is an oversight because there were some other matters last night that necessitated my absence from the office. Basically there are four print examiners that lifted seventeen latent prints from the Bundy crime scene. We simply want to stipulate as a foundational matter that those prints were in fact lifted. And Mr. Gilbert Aguilar, who is now present, will testify about the nature of those lifts and what results, if any, were obtained.
Put it in writing. That is all I want. Let's see it in writing and see what they want. I'm sure I will be glad to stipulate, but I need to see what they want. I was informed when I came in that Mr. Cochran approached the Court to make a request concerning the removal of the tapes that they had given to Judge Reid and you ordered that into his court?
KEY QUOTENo. I indicated that they wanted to do some enhancement on the tapes and I indicated that since Judge Reid has custody of the originals, and that matter has been transferred to Judge Reid, Judge Reid has jurisdiction over those tapes, I can't issue any orders regarding removing.
All right. So we will just sit here and wait for Mr. Hodgman to arrive and for Mr. Harris to print out our objections.
All right. Is there anything else we can do while we are waiting? What is our prognosis of proceeding with witnesses tomorrow?
All right. Because I hate to have a completely down day. I mean, not that I couldn't use the day to do other things, since you want me to listen to eight or ten hours of audiotape and read hundreds of pages of transcript, it would be nice to not have to do that at home.
KEY QUOTEBut by the same token, we have the jury in there. As I mentioned to you both yesterday, they are a little antsy.
We understand and we are anxious to finish this case, as the Court is and as the jury is.
All right. Am I correct that my assumption is that we are going to attempt to complete the Defense case by the end of next week?
All right. As I recollect, Mr. Darden asked for a date to begin--target date to begin subpoenaing in rebuttal witnesses, and we will start that about the 28th, give or take a day or two.
Then if there is no objection, just to--so that the jury understands our status, I am going to tell them that despite the fact that we have down time today and tomorrow, that we anticipate concluding the Defense case sometime around the 28th and the presentation of any rebuttal the week of the 28th.
Your Honor, the only caveat is that we cannot anticipate how long the cross-examination will be--
I hate to have a completely down day. I mean, not that I couldn't use the day to do other things, since you want me to listen to eight or ten hours of audiotape and read hundreds of pages of transcript, it would be nice to not have to do that at home.
As I mentioned to you both yesterday, they are a little antsy.
Basically there are four print examiners that lifted seventeen latent prints from the Bundy crime scene. We simply want to stipulate as a foundational matter that those prints were in fact lifted.
Put it in writing. That is all I want. Let's see it in writing and see what they want.
We had hoped--we had hoped to have an outside limit, August the 28th.