JUST A MATTER OF PROCEDURE. I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE COURT'S INTENTION WAS. YOU RECALL THAT WE HAD RECEIVED A NOTE FROM ONE OR TWO OF THE JURORS REGARDING SOME INCIDENT INVOLVING BEING KICKED OR WHATEVER.
I THINK THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THE COURT NEEDS TO INQUIRE INTO EARLIER, RATHER THAN LATER, AND I JUST WANTED TO ASK WHAT YOUR PLANS WERE.
MY PLANS ARE TO BRING IN JEANETTE HARRIS AT FOUR O'CLOCK ON WEDNESDAY AND TO GO OVER THE SPECIFICS OF HER COMMENTS, AND SHE INCLUDES IN THAT THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT, BEING INVOLVED IN IT, SO I WANT TO GET IT FROM HER FIRST. THEN I AM GOING TO INTERVIEW THE TWO OTHER PEOPLE INVOLVED AND THEN I WILL PROBABLY GO THROUGH AND TALK TO EACH ONE OF THE JURORS INDIVIDUALLY.
MY ONLY CONCERN WAS -- AND THAT'S FINE -- IS THAT -- I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY GET TO IT, BUT I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED WERE THEY NOT CONCERNED ABOUT A LACK OF RESPONSE. SHE SAID THAT IN THE INTERVIEW WE HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING ELSE ABOUT IT, SO MAYBE IF THERE IS SOME WAY THE COURT WILL INDICATE SOMETHING WILL BE HAPPENING.
I MUST TELL YOU, THOUGH, THAT PEOPLE BEING OUTRAGED AND OFFENDED BY SOMEBODY PERHAPS CROSSING OVER THEM AND INADVERTENTLY HITTING THEM, I MEAN, THIS INITIALLY STRUCK ME AS SOMETHING SO TRIVIAL TO BE UNBELIEVABLE.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ONE INCIDENT OVER SEVERAL MONTHS OF TRIAL FILING IN AND OUT OF THE COURTROOM.
LET'S NOT FORGET THIS IS ALSO THE WOMAN WHO CLAIMED THAT ANOTHER JUROR PUSHED HER.
KEY QUOTEWHAT I'M SAYING, JUDGE, AGAIN I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND, I THINK -- AND I WANT TO MAKE THIS AS CLEAR AS I CAN, I THINK YOU SHOULD NOT UNDERESTIMATE THIS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THIS CASE AND PEOPLE'S PERCEPTIONS.
SO I'M JUST SAYING -- AND IF PEOPLE HAVE THE PERCEPTION THAT YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT, I'M TELLING YOU THAT I BELIEVE IT WILL RESULT IN FURTHER PROBLEMS. THAT IS JUST MY LITTLE HUMBLE GUESS.
I JUST THOUGHT IF PEOPLE DON'T THINK WE ARE DOING ANYTHING -- I THINK WE HAVE TO GET ON WITH THE TRIAL.
YOUR HONOR, ON A SEPARATE ISSUE AS TO THE VIDEOTAPE -- AS TO THE VIDEOTAPE THAT COUNSEL WANTS TO PLAY DEPICTING THE OBJECT THAT THEY ARE CONTENDING IS A GLOVE, WE'VE HAD THE TAPE LOOKED AT AND IT APPEARS THAT IT IS SHOT ON THE TAPE THAT WE HAVE IS VHS AND NOT BETA. WE HAVE A DECLARATION FROM THE EXPERT THAT I JUST GOT RIGHT NOW THAT I WOULD LIKE TO FILE WITH THE COURT, BUT THERE IS NOW A BEST EVIDENCE OBJECTION THAT WE WILL LODGE AND WOULD LIKE TO LODGE TO IT THAT WE WEREN'T AWARE OF AND COULD NOT HAVE BEEN AWARE OF.
I THINK YOU SHOULD NOT UNDERESTIMATE THIS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THIS CASE AND PEOPLE'S PERCEPTIONS.
PEOPLE BEING OUTRAGED AND OFFENDED BY SOMEBODY PERHAPS CROSSING OVER THEM AND INADVERTENTLY HITTING THEM, I MEAN, THIS INITIALLY STRUCK ME AS SOMETHING SO TRIVIAL TO BE UNBELIEVABLE.
LET'S NOT FORGET THIS IS ALSO THE WOMAN WHO CLAIMED THAT ANOTHER JUROR PUSHED HER.
REMEMBER, THOU SHALL NOT WHINE.