Ladies and gentlemen, in a civil case, there are several ways that non-courtroom testimony comes in. One of the ways is when one party serves upon another party a request for admissions; and the other party responds. And in that instance the question and the response is received just as though it was given here in court and it's given to you just as though it were evidence. Everyone -- everybody understand that?
THE JURORS: Yes.
KEY QUOTE(Reading:).
Plaintiff Fredric Goldman first set of admission. It's directed at Defendant Orenthal James Simpson to 22033 of the California Civil Code of Procedure.
Fredric Goldman requests that defendant, Orenthal James Simpson, admit the following matters of fact:
Request No. 196: Admit that your ABO blood type is A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
Request No. 194: Admit that your EAP blood type is EA.
Defendant's response: Admit.
Request number 213: Admit that you have an ESE blood type 1.
Defendant's response: Admit.
Request No. 195: Admit that your phosphoglucomutase, here and after, PGM blood type 2 plus 2 minus.
Defendant response: Admit.
Request number 205: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 49 contained human blood that had an ABO type A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 203: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 49 contained human blood that had an EAP blood type of BA.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting that request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection for any other point in time.
Request number 212: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 49 contained human blood that had an ESE blood type 1.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point of time.
Request number 204: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 49 contained human blood that had a PGM blood sub type of 2 plus, 2 minus.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request No. 199: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 47, contained human blood that had an ABO blood type A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection for or any other point in time.
Request No. 198: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 47, contained human blood that had a PGM blood sub type of 2 plus, 2 minus.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 202: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 48 contained human blood that had an ABO blood type A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 201: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 48, contained human blood that had a PGM blood sub type of 2 plus, 2 minus.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 208: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 50 contained human blood that had an ABO blood type A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 206: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 50 contained human blood that had an EAP blood type BA.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to time of collection or any other point this time.
Request number 207: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item number 50, contained human blood that had a PGM blood subtype of 2 plus, 2 minus.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 211: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 52, contained human blood that had an ABO blood type A.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request number 209: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 52, contained human blood that had an EAP blood type of BA.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting this request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Request No. 210: Admit that the item identified at the criminal trial as LAPD evidence item 52, contained human blood that had a PGM blood sub type of 2 plus, 2 minus.
Defendant's response: Admit.
In admitting that request for admission, the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
And I would ask Your Honor that these requests for admissions be marked exhibits 2112 through 2129 and be received into evidence.
In admitting this request for admission the defense will adopt the plaintiff's definition as communicated to the defendant as that point in time when an item was tested by an outside laboratory as opposed to the time of collection or any other point in time.
Ladies and gentlemen, in a civil case, there are several ways that non-courtroom testimony comes in. One of the ways is when one party serves upon another party a request for admissions; and the other party responds. And in that instance the question and the response is received just as though it was given here in court.
Request No. 196: Admit that your ABO blood type is A. Defendant's response: Admit.