Because there's a classic pattern of when you step in blood with shoes and you walk down a walkway. First you're leaving more detailed impressions, then you're leaving ones that have insufficient detail to recognize their design or recognize their size. So I would expect that that is -- that is a classic pattern, based on the work I've done and my experience, where you will see most of them closer to the scene, and the further they get away, first you get one or two that are indistinct and then all of them are indistinct.
If there was a second person would he have to jump about 30 feet before he got to the blue area?
MR. P. BAKER: Speculation.
(BY MR. MEDVENE) In your opinion, from examining the photos and where the shoe prints were found, what would a person do if he didn't have a Bruno Magli shoe and left this blue imprint, how would he get from the cage area to the area where the first blue imprint is found?
MR. P. BAKER: Speculation, beyond his expertise.
That person would have to have left the heavier blood impressions that would be distinctly visible, prior to getting to the point where he left the oval blue impressions. In other words, there would be darker impressions that were recognizable before that person got to the oval blue areas.
KEY QUOTEBecause that person, if he had blood on his feet or shoes, would be depositing that blood as he walked or ran down the walkway, and also only until he got to the point where enough blood had worn off of his shoes would he leave the indistinct impression.
There was no indication from any photographs I examined in connection with the scene, that there was any other set of bloody footprints other than Bruno Magli.
KEY QUOTEThere was no indication from any photographs I examined in connection with the scene, that there was any other set of bloody footprints other than Bruno Magli.
That person would have to have left the heavier blood impressions that would be distinctly visible, prior to getting to the point where he left the oval blue impressions.